44 Site-I_Stupa 5 Detached Ayaka pillar inscription G year 2

J.Ph. Vogel - EI, XX, p 23_4, Detached Ayaka pillar inscription G 1
K. Raghunath I.V. p. 129 (No 27)

TEXT (Vogel)

(l. 1) [Si]dhaì namo bhagavato teloka-dhaìma-dhurà-vahasa mahàràja[sa Viró-]
(l. 2) [pa]khapati-Mahàsena-parigahitasa Agihot-Àgiòhoma-[Vàjape-]
(l. 3) y-Àsamedha-y-[a]yi(ji)sa hiraìía-koòi-go-satasaha[sa-hala-sata-]
(l. 4) sahasa-padài(yi)sa savathesu apatihata-saìka[pasa] . .
(l. 5) [Và]seòhiputasa Ikhàkunaì Siri-Chàtamólasa sun[hà]ya [mahàràja-]
(l. 6) sa Màäha[ri]putasa Ikhàkunaì Siri-Vèrapurisadatasa bhayaya ma-
(l. 7) hàrajasa Siri-E[huvuëa-]Chàtamólasa màtuya mahàd[e]viya Bhaòidevàya
(l. 8) . . . . . . . [i]maì vihàro sava-jàta-niyuto achariy[à]naì Bahusutèyànaì
(l. 9) patiòhà[pito] . . . . i ra pu naì budhiía . . . . [saìvachharaì]. .[bitiyaì]
(l. 10) [gimha-pakhaì] . . . . . . . . . . sughàya ti
___________________________
The first half of the inscription has been restored with the aid of the corresponding passage in other inscriptions.
L. 6. The second akshara (for Màäha[ri]putasa) may be either äa or äha; this mutilated word can hardly be anything but bhayàya.
L. 7. The aksharas -huvuëa are damaged owing to a crack, but hu is still legible.
L. 8. Or should we read sava-jina-niyuto ? The akshara, following sava- is certainly jà. In the other inscriptions we find savaniyuto.
L. 9. [. . . . . . Virapunaìbudhiía . (proper name ?) raão.—Ed.]
L. 10. The date appears to have been followed by a benedictory formula such as sava-loka-hita-sukhàya.

TEXT (Raghunath)

1. (si)dhaì namo bhagavato teloka-dhaìma-dhuràvahasa mahàràja (Viró)-
2. (pa)khapati mahàseêa-parigahitasa Agihot-Àgiòhoma-(vàjape)-
3. y-Àsamedha-y(à)yi(ji) sa hiraìía-koòi-go-satasaha(sa-hala-sata)
4. sahasa-padài(yi)sa savathesu apatihata-saìka(pasa)
5. (yà)sethiputasa Ikhàkunaì Siri-Chàtamulasa suê(hà)ya (mahàràja)
6. sa Màäha(ri)putasa Ikhàakunaì Siri Virapurisadatasa bhayàya ma-
7. hàràjasa Siri-E(huvula) Chàtamólasa màtuya mahàd(e)viya Ehaòidevàya
8. ...........(i)maì vihàro sava-jàta-niyuto achariy(à)nam bahusutiyànaì
9. patitha(pito)..............ira punaì budhina ..........(giìvachharaì)....(bitiyam)
10. (giìha-pakham).....................sughàya ti
___________________
L 6. The second akshara may be either 'da' or dha. This mutilated word can hardly be anything but 'bhayaya'
L 7. The aksharas-'huvula' are damaged owing to a crack, but 'hu' is still legible.
L 8. We should read 'sava-jina-nivuto' ? The akshara following 'sava-' is certainly 'ja', In the other inscriptions we find 'Savaniyuto'.
L. 9. (...........'virapunambudhina' (proper name?) rano-Ed.)
L 10. The date appears to have been followed by benedictory formula such as 'Sava-loka-hite-sukhaya'