Notes.
L. 1. (Start of stk.) The record may have opened with an obeisance to Viøíu.
L. 2. (For vyadadhada) The correct grammatical form would be vyadadhàd=. (For hatàmàyurapyórjji[tåpan]) The context requires a reading like apy=órjjitaì vaõ. (After [tpala*]) Restore ùyàmalàm. SR has ùrèyyaõ
L. 3. SR has [ùaùatsu]svàyàstu-vaõ, from notes - according to correction slip for kakøayà read kàntayàkàsauyà.
L. 4. SR has from notes - according to correction slip for hi(tå ?) vàgbhirnna - kiìvàgbhirnnu-; -ambhadhivèci-
L. 5. (End of verse 6)SR- Some four akøaras like dbhavî vaìùaõ are lost here. It is curious to note that the name Ùrè-Pórííàditya in characters of the 8th century A. D. occure on two pillars of this temple at Ràjim, A.S.I.R., Vol. XVII, Plate X. [The visarga-sandhi in the preceding word - pratàpî does not justify the proposed reading Póraííàditya in the present insctance.—B.C.C.]. SR has ghàram; harivvaõ; -pratàpî(paõ) - in notes - according to the correction slip read - -pratàpè;
L. 6. SR has àsid-; -pàdapadamaõ
L. 8. VM, SR suggest (For [tð] ß ß ÿ maõ) The last seven akøaras of this verse were probably Màndhàtð-ràj-îpamaõ.
L. 9. VM, SR suggest (For [ùru]tåna ca pàì) The context requires a reading like ùrutåna vimalaõ. (After -tastyà) Restore s=tyàginàì.
L. 10. SR: suggest in notes - instead [rvvu(rbbu)]dhaõ read -rgguíaiõ.
L. 11. SR: has gamînuràgàdharaõ instead gamànuràgadharaõ; according correction slip after vilàsatuêgaõ read -prathita.
L. 12. SR: according correction slip for vijayàdhè[ùaì ?] read vijayè dhèraõ
L. 14. SR read yaùî instead yaùàì
L. 15 VM, SR (End of stk.) The akøaras lost here and at the beginning of the next line may have been su-viùa. SR: according correction slip for [ni]tyana[vyå ?] read janmanede-;SR: instead pràtarvvà[rvvà]làrkkarîcir- read pràtarbàlàrkkarîcir-
L. 16. SR read mahad-dóøaíaì instead mahad-bhóøaíaì; instead dðøòirasyàm read dðøòirasyam
L. 18. VM, SR (After vici[traì]) Restore jagat. VM (For puruøåía) These akøaras are almost clear in the estampage.
L. 19. VM, SR (Verse. 26) This and the next pàda must have begun with yàvat. (For bhàsanti) VM, SR This is incorrect for bhàsante. SR read lîlàlîka instead lålàlîka;
L. 20. SR: according correction slip for si[ktha ?] read sindhu; VM, SR (After dhavalà) Some word like nidràti is expected here, but the first akøara appears like ha. VM, SR (End of stk.) Restore pràjãàõ; SR read vakøa[sthalå], va ß nti;
L. 21. VM (After praùasti) Restore r=åøà. SR read pràviracità;