Notes
L. 1. LP read: îì svasti [|*], îì expressed by a symbol. (LP); AMS (in
notes) Siddham expressed by a symbol. (For vikkramî) one part of the medial o is attached
to the top of m and the other part is formed by the elongation to the right of the
horizontal line of m.
L. 3. (For paramabhàgavatî) The engraver had begun to incise ma after pa, but later on
corrected it into ra. (LP)
L. 4. (For ùùrè) The subscript r appears like the sign of medial ð. (LP), LP read
tîsaddu(äu)bhuktèya-
L. 5. This (|) mark of punctuation is shown by two dots. (LP) Pandeya transcribes this
mark of punctuation, which consists of a couple of strokes, by a single daíäa. (AMS)
L. 7. LP read -àndhakà[raì], in notes: The letter ra which was first omitted is written
below ja of jagad with a kàkapada sign and the anusvàra meant for ra is placed on kà.
The cross on ja shows that a syllable was omitted.; (AMS in notes) Ra, which was at first
omitted by oversight, is written below ja with a kàkapada mark (+) and the anusvàra,
which should have been placed over ra, is placed over kà. (For jagad-) There is a
kàkapada over ja indicating that something has to be inserted here. Actually its proper
place was over kà.
L. 8. òa in bhaòa is written below the line. The visarga (in visarjjitaõ) is
superfluous.
L. 10. LP read: adhyarddhàêùana (in notes: read adhyarddhàìùåna);
kumàravatsaà(vatsà)nnå-.
L. 11. LP read yajãasvàmina(nau), in notes: read pratyaìùåna. Kha, which is faint in
the facsimile accompanying Pandeya's article, is quite clear in the facsimile given by
B.C. Jain.
L. 12. Pandeya reads -madhyandina-. But the medial à is clearly indicated by the downward
elongation of the right vertical of m, AMS reads -gîlasvàmi(mè),
(for åvaì): This word is unnecessary.(AMS). LP reads dàmasvàmi.
L. 13. in notes name read: pratyardhàìùåna.
L. 14. (For anumîditaõ) The medial i sign which was first engraved above taõ by mistake
has been cancelled. Lp. read tå yóyam=.
L. 16. (After viùiøòa) There are two small horizontal strokes here (LP), There is full
mark of punctuation here which is unnecessary. (AMS)
L. 18. Metre: Vasantatilakà. LP read gîpta[m].
L. 20. The sign of punctuation (||) here is superfluous.
L. 21. Metre: Indravajrà.
L. 23. LP read: datà(ttà).
L. 24. Metre: Anuøòubh.
L. 25. The syllables dànà which were omitted here have been incised below the line with
a kàkapada sign. Read --mahimatàã-, pàlanam || iti. Metre: Anuøòubh. (LP). The
letters dànà, which were omitted here, have been engraved below the line with a
kàkapada mark. There is a kàkapada sign before øòha also. Its proper place was after
øòha. (AMS)
L. 26. [I am inclined to read this symbol 8 as 7.-Ed. in EI] LP read 8 instead 7 and
Drîía[siìghå]na. AMS about date: Pandeya reads the figure as 8, but we feel inclined
to agree with N.P. Chakravarti in taking it as 7. See El, xxiii, 22, fn. 4.